Home » LAW »» Additional Legal Subjects

crypto sms (Additional Legal Subjects)

Comments (29) | Promote | Bookmark |

• Leave a Comment Now.
• Comments
• Thu, 23 Jun 2005 22:53:00 GMT(1)
• sammy wrote:
  On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 20:21:16 +1000, Crypto@lawknowledge.org.S.M.S wrote:sammy wrote:On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 18:11:48 +1000, Crypto@lawknowledge.org.S.M.S wrote:<snip>>So this is how you discuss the real issues? The original advice I>received when joining Usenet was correct, i.e. it is full of crazies>who would rather trade nasty remarks than information.>>Why don't you explain how you will unhash MD5 to reveal the pass phrase?>>Or better yet, explain why you resort to insults in a science newsgroup?>Got nothing better to contribute?>I've heard the French authorities now actually strongly recommendCryptoSMS to French citizens who inquire as to which method theyshould use to keep their information private.This comes as a vicious back-handed slap to the inventors of ROT-13,the previous recipients of French authority recommendation for crypto.He repeats himself when under stress. I've repeated words, and will continue to do so, just to add some truthful counterpoint to your ignorant defence of an inferior, and likely worthless software product "claiming" to be crypto. But it is clearly obvious to everyone but you and your other self posting as a different person that it has nothing to do with stress. It is rewarding on different levels to dispute the claims of snake oil vendors (like you), and to let persons who post under different names in order to fake credulity (like you) know that pretty much everyone sees through their phony pitiful attempts (like yours). You are posting under both Crypto@lawknowledge.org.S.M.S and " \"- Prof. Jonez\"" and from what I can tell, possibly other personas. Its pretty sad. I'm happy to continue to repeat the truth about what you are doing, your ignorance of proper crypto, and the fake personas you are very unsuccessfully trying to perpetrate, and I can continue to do so with little effort. And I'm determined to do so. It takes so little time for me to do this. It is so easy when you have truth on your side. So get used to it. "Both" of you... schizoid lamer.
  
  Con-fuse as many different people as you like.
  All the best characters in fiction are composites
  of many real life individuals.
• Thu, 23 Jun 2005 01:11:00 GMT(2)
• sammy wrote:
  On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 23:49:28 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez\"" <jonez@lawknowledge.org.norcom.ca> wrote: <snip> Hey... you're late for your costume change, schizoid dweeb. " \"- Prof. Jonez\"" You are a pitiful lamer. Crypto@lawknowledge.org.S.M.S You are a pitiful lamer. " \"- Prof. Jonez\"" You are a pitiful lamer. Crypto@lawknowledge.org.S.M.S You are a pitiful lamer. " \"- Prof. Jonez\"" You are a pitiful lamer. Crypto@lawknowledge.org.S.M.S You are a pitiful lamer. " \"- Prof. Jonez\"" You are a pitiful lamer. Crypto@lawknowledge.org.S.M.S You are a pitiful lamer. " \"- Prof. Jonez\"" You are a pitiful lamer. Crypto@lawknowledge.org.S.M.S You are a pitiful lamer. " \"- Prof. Jonez\"" You are a pitiful lamer. Crypto@lawknowledge.org.S.M.S You are a pitiful lamer. " \"- Prof. Jonez\"" You are a pitiful lamer. Crypto@lawknowledge.org.S.M.S You are a pitiful lamer. " \"- Prof. Jonez\"" You are a pitiful lamer. Crypto@lawknowledge.org.S.M.S You are a pitiful lamer. Which one are you now? Answer: The pitiful lamer. One "evil genius" makes a crappy thing, and then defends it with posts from himself and all his alter egos. It gets old, really fast. You didn't invent that, either. Pssst... come here... OK listen... Look... The smell of failure is rising off of you like the waves of heat from a hot desert highway.
  
  So this is how you discuss the real issues? The original advice I
  received when joining Usenet was correct, i.e. it is full of crazies
  who would rather trade nasty remarks than information.
  
  Why don't you explain how you will unhash MD5 to reveal the pass phrase?
  
  Or better yet, explain why you resort to insults in a science newsgroup?
  Got nothing better to contribute?
• Fri, 24 Jun 2005 15:10:00 GMT(3)
• <Crypto@lawknowledge.org.S.M.S> wrote in message
  news:11bn7uiqhpk3u42@lawknowledge.org.news.supernews.com... Con-fuse as many different people as you like. All the best characters in fiction are composites of many real life individuals.
  
  Yes, and there seems to be quite a lot of fiction in your
  claims; not much real life, though.
• Sat, 25 Jun 2005 09:37:00 GMT(4)
• sammy wrote: On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 09:54:43 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez\"" <jonez@lawknowledge.org.norcom.ca> wrote: sammy wrote: On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 09:23:24 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez\"" <jonez@lawknowledge.org.norcom.ca> wrote: > sammy wrote: > > On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 15:53:20 +1000, Crypto@lawknowledge.org.S.M.S wrote: > > > > > sammy wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 20:21:16 +1000, Crypto@lawknowledge.org.S.M.S wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > sammy wrote: > > > > > > > <snip> > > > > > > > > I've repeated words, and will continue to do so, just to > > > > add some truthful counterpoint to your ignorant defence > > > > of an inferior, and likely worthless software product > > > > "claiming" to be crypto. > > > > > > > > But it is clearly obvious to everyone but you and your > > > > other self posting as a different person that it has > > > > nothing to do with stress. > > > > > > > > It is rewarding on different levels to dispute the claims > > > > of snake oil vendors (like you), and to let persons who > > > > post under different names in order to fake credulity > > > > (like you) know that pretty much everyone sees through > > > > their phony pitiful attempts (like yours). > > > > > > > > You are posting under both Crypto@lawknowledge.org.S.M.S and " \"- Prof. > > > > Jonez\"" and from what I can tell, possibly other > > > > personas. Its pretty sad. > > > > > > > > I'm happy to continue to repeat the truth about what you > > > > are doing, your ignorance of proper crypto, and the fake > > > > personas you are very unsuccessfully trying to > > > > perpetrate, and I can continue to do so with little > > > > effort. > > > > > > > > And I'm determined to do so. It takes so little time for > > > > me to do this. It is so easy when you have truth on your > > > > side. > > > > > > > > So get used to it. "Both" of you... schizoid lamer. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Con-fuse as many different people as you like. > > > All the best characters in fiction are composites > > > of many real life individuals. I've repeated words because I've a vacuous idiot and stammering jackass with OCD and will continue to do so, I'm happy to continue to repeat myself over and over like the stammering jackass that I am.
• Mon, 27 Jun 2005 20:29:00 GMT(5)
• " "- Prof. Jonez"" <jonez@lawknowledge.org.norcom.ca> wrote in message
  news:lj3we.61$h52.1473@lawknowledge.org.news.uswest.net... John E. Hadstate wrote: " "- Prof. Jonez"" <jonez@lawknowledge.org.norcom.ca> wrote in message news:hUWve.16$h52.139@lawknowledge.org.news.uswest.net... John E. Hadstate wrote: > " "- Prof. Jonez"" <jonez@lawknowledge.org.norcom.ca> wrote in message > news:CGKve.108$kw1.2921@lawknowledge.org.news.uswest.net... > > Got a citation, any at all, where I posted or made any > > technical claims about CryptoSMS ? Put up or shut up, > > jackass. > > > > > > Hey there, troll! Who do you think you are to order > people > around, pimp? This is USENET, sonny. We post what we > want, > when we want. And we don't dance to the tune of a troll > jackass like you. Translation: You were caught out lying again, all mouth, no action. Have it your way, troll. I frankly don't care what you think. Tranlation: See Above -- LOL!
  
  I'll second that Lol! Too damned funny. :)
  
  ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
  http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
  ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
• Thu, 23 Jun 2005 03:21:00 GMT(6)
• sammy wrote: On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 18:11:48 +1000, Crypto@lawknowledge.org.S.M.S wrote: <snip>So this is how you discuss the real issues? The original advice Ireceived when joining Usenet was correct, i.e. it is full of crazieswho would rather trade nasty remarks than information.Why don't you explain how you will unhash MD5 to reveal the pass phrase?Or better yet, explain why you resort to insults in a science newsgroup?Got nothing better to contribute? I've heard the French authorities now actually strongly recommend CryptoSMS to French citizens who inquire as to which method they should use to keep their information private. This comes as a vicious back-handed slap to the inventors of ROT-13, the previous recipients of French authority recommendation for crypto.
  
  He repeats himself when under stress.
• Sun, 26 Jun 2005 13:55:00 GMT(7)
• On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 00:26:38 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez\""
  <jonez@lawknowledge.org.norcom.ca> wrote:
  Sure thing psycho ... I'm posting as everyone ... even you. Its pretty sad.Yes, your abject paranoia and ignorance surely is.
  
  No. You posted in this very thread under both names of the clueless
  lamers Crypto@lawknowledge.org.S.M.S and " \"- Prof. Jonez\""
  
  You aren't fooling anyone by your actions now.
  
  You did it. And you did it to defend a lame crypto product. And
  everyone reading this from sci.crypt has seen this before.
  
  So your pitiful actions will continue to get the spotlight.
• Sun, 26 Jun 2005 16:55:00 GMT(8)
• On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 15:07:13 -0600, " \"- Prof Jonez\""
  <jonez@lawknowledge.org.norcom.ca> wrote:
  sammy wrote: On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 00:26:38 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez\"" <jonez@lawknowledge.org.norcom.ca> wrote: Sure thing psycho ... I'm posting as everyone ... even you. > Its pretty sad. Yes, your abject paranoia and ignorance surely is. > No. You posted in this very thread under both names of the clueless lamers Crypto@lawknowledge.org.S.M.S and " \"- Prof. Jonez\""Yet you're wrong again you imbalanced psychopath.
  
  No. You posted in this very thread under both names of the clueless
  lamers Crypto@lawknowledge.org.S.M.S and " \"- Prof. Jonez\""
  
  You did it. So your pitiful actions will continue to get the
  spotlight as long as you continue to do so.
• Sun, 26 Jun 2005 20:45:00 GMT(9)
• sammy wrote: On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 15:07:13 -0600, " \"- Prof Jonez\"" <jonez@lawknowledge.org.norcom.ca> wrote: sammy wrote: On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 00:26:38 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez\"" <jonez@lawknowledge.org.norcom.ca> wrote: > Sure thing psycho ... I'm posting as everyone ... even you. > > > > Its pretty sad. > > Yes, your abject paranoia and ignorance surely is. > > > No. You posted in this very thread under both names of the clueless lamers Crypto@lawknowledge.org.S.M.S and " \"- Prof. Jonez\"" Yet you're wrong again you imbalanced psychopath. No. You posted in this very thread under both names of the clueless lamers Crypto@lawknowledge.org.S.M.S and " \"- Prof. Jonez\""
  
  You lie yet again you psychotic imbecile.
  I've repeated words because I've a vacuous idiot and stammering jackass with OCD and will continue to do so, I'm happy to continue to repeat myself over and over like the stammering jackass that I am.
• Mon, 27 Jun 2005 01:00:00 GMT(10)
• On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 21:45:57 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez\""
  <jonez@lawknowledge.org.norcom.ca> wrote:
  sammy wrote: On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 15:07:13 -0600, " \"- Prof Jonez\"" <jonez@lawknowledge.org.norcom.ca> wrote: sammy wrote: > On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 00:26:38 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez\"" > <jonez@lawknowledge.org.norcom.ca> wrote: > > > Sure thing psycho ... I'm posting as everyone ... even you. > > > > > > > Its pretty sad. > > > > Yes, your abject paranoia and ignorance surely is. > > > > > > > No. You posted in this very thread under both names of the > clueless lamers Crypto@lawknowledge.org.S.M.S and " \"- Prof. Jonez\"" Yet you're wrong again you imbalanced psychopath. No. You posted in this very thread under both names of the clueless lamers Crypto@lawknowledge.org.S.M.S and " \"- Prof. Jonez\""You lie yet again you psychotic imbecile.
  
  No. You posted in this very thread under both names of the clueless
  lamers Crypto@lawknowledge.org.S.M.S and " \"- Prof. Jonez\""
  
  You did it. So your pitiful actions will continue to get the
  spotlight as long as you continue to do so.
• Mon, 27 Jun 2005 10:42:00 GMT(11)
• John E. Hadstate wrote: " "- Prof. Jonez"" <jonez@lawknowledge.org.norcom.ca> wrote in message news:CGKve.108$kw1.2921@lawknowledge.org.news.uswest.net... Got a citation, any at all, where I posted or made any technical claims about CryptoSMS ? Put up or shut up, jackass. Hey there, troll! Who do you think you are to order people around, pimp? This is USENET, sonny. We post what we want, when we want. And we don't dance to the tune of a troll jackass like you.
  
  Translation: You were caught out lying again, all mouth, no action.
• Mon, 27 Jun 2005 16:25:00 GMT(12)
• " "- Prof. Jonez"" <jonez@lawknowledge.org.norcom.ca> wrote in message
  news:hUWve.16$h52.139@lawknowledge.org.news.uswest.net... John E. Hadstate wrote: " "- Prof. Jonez"" <jonez@lawknowledge.org.norcom.ca> wrote in message news:CGKve.108$kw1.2921@lawknowledge.org.news.uswest.net... Got a citation, any at all, where I posted or made any technical claims about CryptoSMS ? Put up or shut up, jackass. Hey there, troll! Who do you think you are to order people around, pimp? This is USENET, sonny. We post what we want, when we want. And we don't dance to the tune of a troll jackass like you. Translation: You were caught out lying again, all mouth, no action.
  
  Well, that was my immediate conclusion, anyway. (But, you failed to consider
  the considerable mouth action.)
  
  ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
  http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
  ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
• Fri, 24 Jun 2005 08:43:00 GMT(13)
• On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 09:23:24 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez\""
  <jonez@lawknowledge.org.norcom.ca> wrote:
  sammy wrote: On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 15:53:20 +1000, Crypto@lawknowledge.org.S.M.S wrote: sammy wrote: > On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 20:21:16 +1000, Crypto@lawknowledge.org.S.M.S wrote: > > > > sammy wrote: > > <snip> > > I've repeated words, and will continue to do so, just to add some > truthful counterpoint to your ignorant defence of an inferior, and > likely worthless software product "claiming" to be crypto. > > But it is clearly obvious to everyone but you and your other self > posting as a different person that it has nothing to do with > stress. > > It is rewarding on different levels to dispute the claims of > snake oil vendors (like you), and to let persons who post under > different names in order to fake credulity (like you) know that > pretty much everyone sees through their phony pitiful attempts > (like yours). > > You are posting under both Crypto@lawknowledge.org.S.M.S and " \"- Prof. Jonez\"" > and from what I can tell, possibly other personas. Its pretty > sad. > > I'm happy to continue to repeat the truth about what you are > doing, your ignorance of proper crypto, and the fake personas you > are very unsuccessfully trying to perpetrate, and I can continue > to do so with little effort. > > And I'm determined to do so. It takes so little time for me to do > this. It is so easy when you have truth on your side. > > So get used to it. "Both" of you... schizoid lamer. > > Con-fuse as many different people as you like. All the best characters in fiction are composites of many real life individuals. Nobody is confused around here. Least of all by me.Bwhahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!Suck those eggs spammy, suck 'em down!
  
  Look what you are reduced to. It is quite revealing.
  
  I've repeated words, and will continue to do so, just to add some
  truthful counterpoint to your ignorant defence of an inferior, and
  likely worthless software product "claiming" to be crypto.
  
  But it is clearly obvious to everyone but you and your other self
  posting as a different person that it has nothing to do with stress.
  
  It is rewarding on different levels to dispute the claims of snake oil
  vendors (like you), and to let persons who post under different names
  in order to fake credulity (like you) know that pretty much everyone
  sees through their phony pitiful attempts (like yours).
  
  You are posting under both Crypto@lawknowledge.org.S.M.S and " \"- Prof. Jonez\"" and
  from what I can tell, possibly other personas. Its pretty sad.
  
  I'm happy to continue to repeat the truth about what you are doing,
  your ignorance of proper crypto, and the fake personas you are very
  unsuccessfully trying to perpetrate, and I can continue to do so with
  little effort.
  
  And I'm determined to do so. It takes so little time for me to do
  this. It is so easy when you have truth on your side.
  
  So get used to it. "Both" of you... you schizoid lamer.
• Sat, 25 Jun 2005 06:15:00 GMT(14)
• On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 09:54:43 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez\""
  <jonez@lawknowledge.org.norcom.ca> wrote:
  sammy wrote: On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 09:23:24 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez\"" <jonez@lawknowledge.org.norcom.ca> wrote: sammy wrote: > On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 15:53:20 +1000, Crypto@lawknowledge.org.S.M.S wrote: > > > sammy wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 20:21:16 +1000, Crypto@lawknowledge.org.S.M.S wrote: > > > > > > > > > > sammy wrote: > > > > > <snip> > > > > > > I've repeated words, and will continue to do so, just to add > > > some truthful counterpoint to your ignorant defence of an > > > inferior, and likely worthless software product "claiming" to > > > be crypto. > > > > > > But it is clearly obvious to everyone but you and your other > > > self posting as a different person that it has nothing to do > > > with stress. > > > > > > It is rewarding on different levels to dispute the claims of > > > snake oil vendors (like you), and to let persons who post > > > under different names in order to fake credulity (like you) > > > know that pretty much everyone sees through their phony > > > pitiful attempts (like yours). > > > > > > You are posting under both Crypto@lawknowledge.org.S.M.S and " \"- Prof. > > > Jonez\"" and from what I can tell, possibly other personas. > > > Its pretty sad. > > > > > > I'm happy to continue to repeat the truth about what you are > > > doing, your ignorance of proper crypto, and the fake personas > > > you are very unsuccessfully trying to perpetrate, and I can > > > continue to do so with little effort. > > > > > > And I'm determined to do so. It takes so little time for me > > > to do this. It is so easy when you have truth on your side. > > > > > > So get used to it. "Both" of you... schizoid lamer. > > > > > > > > > > Con-fuse as many different people as you like. > > All the best characters in fiction are composites > > of many real life individuals.
  
  Nobody is confused around here. Least of all by me. This is a
  somewhat advanced gathering of persons (not you, of course) who are
  not easily confused and can quite readily make a point and understand
  when they are being fed bull****.
  
  That is why virtually everyone here in sci.crypt is waxing the floor
  with your logic (or the lack thereof).
  
  I heard a rumor that they are looking for grade school children to
  engage and then out manuever you logically, as an easy-to-win first
  experience in debate.
• Thu, 23 Jun 2005 22:30:00 GMT(15)
• On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 20:21:16 +1000, Crypto@lawknowledge.org.S.M.S wrote:
  sammy wrote: On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 18:11:48 +1000, Crypto@lawknowledge.org.S.M.S wrote: <snip>>So this is how you discuss the real issues? The original advice Ireceived when joining Usenet was correct, i.e. it is full of crazieswho would rather trade nasty remarks than information.Why don't you explain how you will unhash MD5 to reveal the pass phrase?Or better yet, explain why you resort to insults in a science newsgroup?Got nothing better to contribute? I've heard the French authorities now actually strongly recommend CryptoSMS to French citizens who inquire as to which method they should use to keep their information private. This comes as a vicious back-handed slap to the inventors of ROT-13, the previous recipients of French authority recommendation for crypto.He repeats himself when under stress.
  
  I've repeated words, and will continue to do so, just to add some
  truthful counterpoint to your ignorant defence of an inferior, and
  likely worthless software product "claiming" to be crypto.
  
  But it is clearly obvious to everyone but you and your other self
  posting as a different person that it has nothing to do with stress.
  
  It is rewarding on different levels to dispute the claims of snake oil
  vendors (like you), and to let persons who post under different names
  in order to fake credulity (like you) know that pretty much everyone
  sees through their phony pitiful attempts (like yours).
  
  You are posting under both Crypto@lawknowledge.org.S.M.S and " \"- Prof. Jonez\"" and
  from what I can tell, possibly other personas. Its pretty sad.
  
  I'm happy to continue to repeat the truth about what you are doing,
  your ignorance of proper crypto, and the fake personas you are very
  unsuccessfully trying to perpetrate, and I can continue to do so with
  little effort.
  
  And I'm determined to do so. It takes so little time for me to do
  this. It is so easy when you have truth on your side.
  
  So get used to it. "Both" of you... schizoid lamer.
• Sun, 26 Jun 2005 14:09:00 GMT(16)
• "sammy" <sammy@lawknowledge.org.slammy.com> wrote in message
  news:6g5ub1dnvuimmqibmjmc7dvev6661aao7q@lawknowledge.org.4ax.com... You did it. And you did it to defend a lame crypto product. And everyone reading this from sci.crypt has seen this before.
  
  Careful. It's possible that there are two products called
  "CryptoSMS". The spec sheet below talks about one that is
  based on AES-256 and SHA-256 and provides 128-bits of
  message authentication via SHA? (I'd be surprised if it
  wasn't also SHA-256).
  
  http://www.novamedia.es/pdf/CryptoSMS_ds_2311_ES.pdf
  
  If there's only one CryptoSMS, then Jonezy Boy and his alter
  ego have been seeding this newsgroup with technical bull****
  about it, to what end being anyone's guess.
• Sun, 26 Jun 2005 20:48:00 GMT(17)
• John E. Hadstate wrote: "sammy" <sammy@lawknowledge.org.slammy.com> wrote in message news:6g5ub1dnvuimmqibmjmc7dvev6661aao7q@lawknowledge.org.4ax.com... You did it. And you did it to defend a lame crypto product. And everyone reading this from sci.crypt has seen this before. Careful. It's possible that there are two products called "CryptoSMS".
  
  spammy's an idiot, being careful, or intelligent, isn't in his nature.
  The spec sheet below talks about one that is based on AES-256 and SHA-256 and provides 128-bits of message authentication via SHA? (I'd be surprised if it wasn't also SHA-256). http://www.novamedia.es/pdf/CryptoSMS_ds_2311_ES.pdf If there's only one CryptoSMS, then Jonezy Boy and his alter ego
  
  So now you wanna play as ignorant as spammy?
  have been seeding this newsgroup with technical bull**** about it, to what end being anyone's guess.
  
  Why do you continue to lie, jackass?
  
  Got a citation, any at all, where I posted or made any
  technical claims about CryptoSMS ? Put up or shut up, jackass.
• Sat, 25 Jun 2005 23:26:00 GMT(18)
• Sure thing psycho ... I'm posting as everyone ... even you.
  
  Its pretty sad.
  
  Yes, your abject paranoia and ignorance surely is.
  Look what you are reduced to. It is quite revealing.
  I've repeated words because I've a vacuous idiot and stammering jackass with OCD and will continue to do so, I'm happy to continue to repeat myself over and over like the stammering jackass that I am.
• Mon, 27 Jun 2005 03:56:00 GMT(19)
• " "- Prof. Jonez"" <jonez@lawknowledge.org.norcom.ca> wrote in message
  news:CGKve.108$kw1.2921@lawknowledge.org.news.uswest.net... Got a citation, any at all, where I posted or made any technical claims about CryptoSMS ? Put up or shut up, jackass.
  
  Hey there, troll! Who do you think you are to order people
  around, pimp? This is USENET, sonny. We post what we want,
  when we want. And we don't dance to the tune of a troll
  jackass like you.
• Mon, 27 Jun 2005 10:42:00 GMT(20)
• sammy wrote: On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 21:45:57 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez\"" <jonez@lawknowledge.org.norcom.ca> wrote: sammy wrote: On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 15:07:13 -0600, " \"- Prof Jonez\"" <jonez@lawknowledge.org.norcom.ca> wrote: > sammy wrote: > > On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 00:26:38 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez\"" > > <jonez@lawknowledge.org.norcom.ca> wrote: > > > > > Sure thing psycho ... I'm posting as everyone ... even you. > > > > > > > > > > Its pretty sad. > > > > > > Yes, your abject paranoia and ignorance surely is. > > > > > > > > > > > No. You posted in this very thread under both names of the > > clueless lamers Crypto@lawknowledge.org.S.M.S and " \"- Prof. Jonez\"" > > Yet you're wrong again you imbalanced psychopath. > > No. You posted in this very thread under both names of the clueless lamers Crypto@lawknowledge.org.S.M.S and " \"- Prof. Jonez\"" You lie yet again you psychotic imbecile. No. You posted in this very thread under both names of the clueless lamers Crypto@lawknowledge.org.S.M.S and " \"- Prof. Jonez\""
  
  You really are dumber than a box of rocks, aren't you jackass?
  I've repeated words because I've a vacuous idiot and stammering jackass with OCD and will continue to do so, I'm happy to continue to repeat myself over and over like the stammering jackass that I am.
• Mon, 27 Jun 2005 19:23:00 GMT(21)
• " "- Prof. Jonez"" <jonez@lawknowledge.org.norcom.ca> wrote in message
  news:hUWve.16$h52.139@lawknowledge.org.news.uswest.net... John E. Hadstate wrote: " "- Prof. Jonez"" <jonez@lawknowledge.org.norcom.ca> wrote in message news:CGKve.108$kw1.2921@lawknowledge.org.news.uswest.net... Got a citation, any at all, where I posted or made any technical claims about CryptoSMS ? Put up or shut up, jackass. Hey there, troll! Who do you think you are to order people around, pimp? This is USENET, sonny. We post what we want, when we want. And we don't dance to the tune of a troll jackass like you. Translation: You were caught out lying again, all mouth, no action.
  
  Have it your way, troll. I frankly don't care what you
  think.
• Thu, 23 Jun 2005 03:06:00 GMT(22)
• On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 18:11:48 +1000, Crypto@lawknowledge.org.S.M.S wrote:
  
  <snip>So this is how you discuss the real issues? The original advice Ireceived when joining Usenet was correct, i.e. it is full of crazieswho would rather trade nasty remarks than information.Why don't you explain how you will unhash MD5 to reveal the pass phrase?Or better yet, explain why you resort to insults in a science newsgroup?Got nothing better to contribute?
  
  I've heard the French authorities now actually strongly recommend
  CryptoSMS to French citizens who inquire as to which method they
  should use to keep their information private.
  
  This comes as a vicious back-handed slap to the inventors of ROT-13,
  the previous recipients of French authority recommendation for crypto.
• Sun, 26 Jun 2005 14:07:00 GMT(23)
• sammy wrote: On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 00:26:38 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez\"" <jonez@lawknowledge.org.norcom.ca> wrote: Sure thing psycho ... I'm posting as everyone ... even you. Its pretty sad. Yes, your abject paranoia and ignorance surely is. No. You posted in this very thread under both names of the clueless lamers Crypto@lawknowledge.org.S.M.S and " \"- Prof. Jonez\""
  
  Yet you're wrong again you imbalanced psychopath.
  
  You aren't fooling anyone by your actions now.
  
  'cept an abject fool like you.
  You did it. And you did it to defend a lame crypto product. And everyone reading this from sci.crypt has seen this before.
  
  'cept you have not a single clue of what you speak.
  So your pitiful actions will continue to get the spotlight. I've repeated words because I've a vacuous idiot and stammering jackass with OCD and will continue to do so, I'm happy to continue to repeat myself over and over like the stammering jackass that I am.
• Mon, 27 Jun 2005 11:22:00 GMT(24)
• John E. Hadstate wrote: " "- Prof. Jonez"" <jonez@lawknowledge.org.norcom.ca> wrote in message news:CGKve.108$kw1.2921@lawknowledge.org.news.uswest.net...Got a citation, any at all, where I posted or made anytechnical claims about CryptoSMS ? Put up or shut up,jackass. Hey there, troll! Who do you think you are to order people around, pimp? This is USENET, sonny. We post what we want, when we want. And we don't dance to the tune of a troll jackass like you.
  
  -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
  Hash: SHA1
  
  Should I quote you next time JSH starts up?
  
  "This is USENET, sonny. We post what we want, when we want", he'd
  love that vindication.
  
  -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
  Version: PGP 8.1
  
  iQA/AwUBQsBDrpS9Fk5okqe7EQK+mQCfdKwx6/K0gLv9hnwfTMNYs2ZQp7EAniDW
  aKHlir6Q0et0i+yCeNw2JxOc
  =RvNE
  -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
• Mon, 27 Jun 2005 20:19:00 GMT(25)
• John E. Hadstate wrote: " "- Prof. Jonez"" <jonez@lawknowledge.org.norcom.ca> wrote in message news:hUWve.16$h52.139@lawknowledge.org.news.uswest.net... John E. Hadstate wrote: " "- Prof. Jonez"" <jonez@lawknowledge.org.norcom.ca> wrote in message news:CGKve.108$kw1.2921@lawknowledge.org.news.uswest.net... > Got a citation, any at all, where I posted or made any > technical claims about CryptoSMS ? Put up or shut up, > jackass. > > Hey there, troll! Who do you think you are to order people around, pimp? This is USENET, sonny. We post what we want, when we want. And we don't dance to the tune of a troll jackass like you. Translation: You were caught out lying again, all mouth, no action. Have it your way, troll. I frankly don't care what you think.
  
  Tranlation: See Above -- LOL!
• Fri, 24 Jun 2005 00:48:00 GMT(26)
• On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 15:53:20 +1000, Crypto@lawknowledge.org.S.M.S wrote:
  sammy wrote: On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 20:21:16 +1000, Crypto@lawknowledge.org.S.M.S wrote:sammy wrote:
  <snip> I've repeated words, and will continue to do so, just to add some truthful counterpoint to your ignorant defence of an inferior, and likely worthless software product "claiming" to be crypto. But it is clearly obvious to everyone but you and your other self posting as a different person that it has nothing to do with stress. It is rewarding on different levels to dispute the claims of snake oil vendors (like you), and to let persons who post under different names in order to fake credulity (like you) know that pretty much everyone sees through their phony pitiful attempts (like yours). You are posting under both Crypto@lawknowledge.org.S.M.S and " \"- Prof. Jonez\"" and from what I can tell, possibly other personas. Its pretty sad. I'm happy to continue to repeat the truth about what you are doing, your ignorance of proper crypto, and the fake personas you are very unsuccessfully trying to perpetrate, and I can continue to do so with little effort. And I'm determined to do so. It takes so little time for me to do this. It is so easy when you have truth on your side. So get used to it. "Both" of you... schizoid lamer.Con-fuse as many different people as you like.All the best characters in fiction are compositesof many real life individuals.
  
  Nobody is confused around here. Least of all by me. This is a
  somewhat advanced gathering of persons (not you, of course) who are
  not easily confused and can quite readily make a point and understand
  when they are being fed bull****.
  
  That is why virtually everyone here in sci.crypt is waxing the floor
  with your logic (or the lack thereof).
  
  I heard a rumor that they are looking for grade school children to
  engage and then out manuever you logically, as an easy-to-win first
  experience in debate.
• Fri, 24 Jun 2005 08:54:00 GMT(27)
• sammy wrote: On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 09:23:24 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez\"" <jonez@lawknowledge.org.norcom.ca> wrote: sammy wrote: On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 15:53:20 +1000, Crypto@lawknowledge.org.S.M.S wrote: > sammy wrote: > > > On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 20:21:16 +1000, Crypto@lawknowledge.org.S.M.S wrote: > > > > > > > sammy wrote: > > > <snip> > > > > I've repeated words, and will continue to do so, just to add > > some truthful counterpoint to your ignorant defence of an > > inferior, and likely worthless software product "claiming" to > > be crypto. > > > > But it is clearly obvious to everyone but you and your other > > self posting as a different person that it has nothing to do > > with stress. > > > > It is rewarding on different levels to dispute the claims of > > snake oil vendors (like you), and to let persons who post > > under different names in order to fake credulity (like you) > > know that pretty much everyone sees through their phony > > pitiful attempts (like yours). > > > > You are posting under both Crypto@lawknowledge.org.S.M.S and " \"- Prof. > > Jonez\"" and from what I can tell, possibly other personas. > > Its pretty sad. > > > > I'm happy to continue to repeat the truth about what you are > > doing, your ignorance of proper crypto, and the fake personas > > you are very unsuccessfully trying to perpetrate, and I can > > continue to do so with little effort. > > > > And I'm determined to do so. It takes so little time for me > > to do this. It is so easy when you have truth on your side. > > > > So get used to it. "Both" of you... schizoid lamer. > > > > > > Con-fuse as many different people as you like. > All the best characters in fiction are composites > of many real life individuals. Nobody is confused around here. Least of all by me. Bwhahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa! Suck those eggs spammy, suck 'em down! Look what you are reduced to. It is quite revealing. I've repeated words, and will continue to do so, just to illustrate what an obsessive compulsive jackass I am.
• Sat, 25 Jun 2005 18:26:00 GMT(28)
• You are posting under both Crypto@lawknowledge.org.S.M.S and " \"- Prof. Jonez\"" and
  from what I can tell, possibly other personas. Its pretty sad.
  
  Look what you are reduced to. It is quite revealing.
  
  You have been weighed, measured, and found wanting.
• Fri, 24 Jun 2005 08:23:00 GMT(29)
• sammy wrote: On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 15:53:20 +1000, Crypto@lawknowledge.org.S.M.S wrote: sammy wrote: On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 20:21:16 +1000, Crypto@lawknowledge.org.S.M.S wrote: > sammy wrote: > <snip> I've repeated words, and will continue to do so, just to add some truthful counterpoint to your ignorant defence of an inferior, and likely worthless software product "claiming" to be crypto. But it is clearly obvious to everyone but you and your other self posting as a different person that it has nothing to do with stress. It is rewarding on different levels to dispute the claims of snake oil vendors (like you), and to let persons who post under different names in order to fake credulity (like you) know that pretty much everyone sees through their phony pitiful attempts (like yours). You are posting under both Crypto@lawknowledge.org.S.M.S and " \"- Prof. Jonez\"" and from what I can tell, possibly other personas. Its pretty sad. I'm happy to continue to repeat the truth about what you are doing, your ignorance of proper crypto, and the fake personas you are very unsuccessfully trying to perpetrate, and I can continue to do so with little effort. And I'm determined to do so. It takes so little time for me to do this. It is so easy when you have truth on your side. So get used to it. "Both" of you... schizoid lamer. Con-fuse as many different people as you like. All the best characters in fiction are composites of many real life individuals. Nobody is confused around here. Least of all by me.
  
  Bwhahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!
  
  Suck those eggs spammy, suck 'em down!
• Leave a Comment Now.

Additional Legal Subjects Open Questions

I am looking for a good crypto system to protect our legal communications from the pigs. Preference is to use SMS, so my question is, does anybody know about CryptoSMS, and is it strong enough to confuse the puzzle palace?...

I am looking for a good crypto system to protect our legal communications from the pigs. Preference is to use SMS, so my question is, does anybody know about CryptoSMS, and is it strong enough to confuse the puzzle palace?...

I am looking for a good crypto system to protect our legal communications from the pigs. Preference is to use SMS, so my question is, does anybody know about CryptoSMS, and is it strong enough to confuse the puzzle palace?...

>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote ienjball wrote Remember, the standard is not weather the state can prevail at trial, but simply two questions. Is there a homicide? ">The real answer to that is "no"." Given Ted's poor performance of defining legal terms thus far, its not real......

>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote ">And the real question here is, why has he been hounded and persecuted, when it is MANIFESTLY obvious to everyone who has investigated the case that this was an accident?" 'Manifestly obvious' ?? Sez WHO ?? Lets see some documentation.-------- have a......

My question involves small claims court in the state of: Iowa This case involves 11 of my friends and I, and one irresponsible night of mischief. One night at a party, this group of 12 kids wanted to have some fun by doing an activity that is common among teenagers of any generation,......

On Sat, 7 May 2005 22:14:35 -0700, "Local Louy" <LocalLouy@comcast.net> wrote:Local Louy's reply: this is good, cause he is going to show the burden ofproof and show how the legal system play games otherwise, how the attorneysthink they no it all. I wish I could be there to watch......

Criminal cases 'falsified' in Fla. county MIAMI, March 14 (UPI) ......Deputies at the Broward County (Fla.) Sheriff's Office were instructed by immediate superiors to falsify documents, fabricate confessions and downgrade crimes, Deputy Scott Jordan and others say, to make BSO more attractive to......

"John Gault" <judgedredd@ij.net> wrote in message news:<bidoj6$18ov$1@news1.ij.net>... "JJGun" <jason776@outgun.com> David Moore wrote in message news:bfaf7faa.0308250801.1e03c4b2@posting.google.c om... "John Gault" <judgedredd@ij.net> wrote......

http://www.datafilter.com/mc/lawlessState.html In the eyes of posterity it will inevitably seem that, in safeguarding our freedom, we destroyed it that the vast clandestine apparatus we built up to probe our enemies resources and intentions only served in the end to confuse our own purposes that......

Some questions maybe you're interest in...

[COURTS, LAWYERS & LITIGATION] California. Can a Judge in Small Claims refuse to allow the plaintiff to cross examine the defendants witnesses? Thanks. Jeff......

[Insurance Law] in early 2002 i was laid off and rolled over onto my husbands insurance policy where he works. we were receiving family coverage and assumed everything was fine. last week, my husband was called into his bosses office and told that there was an accounting error and that for the past year, they.........

[Insurance Law] What is the name of your state?What is the name of your state?Alabama I am a non alien but I want to purchase a town house I will be self financing,do I need social security to complete this transaction?......

[Consumer Law & Fraud] My question involves collection proceedings in the State of: California This is a very complicated situation, I will try to be as clear and concise as I can be and only address pressing points. My daughter entered into a contract a year ago for what was supposed to be a personal loan secured by.........

[Government & Administrative Law] What is the name of your state?What is the name of your state?What is the name of your state? Arkansas What is the name of your state?What is the name of your state? Arkansas Anybody ever had any experience with the OCR investigation. You talk about close mouthed, this federal Agency will not.........

[BUSINESS & FINANCIAL & Corporate LAW] What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? TX I basically have inherited a mess. I hope I'm posting this is in the correct area. I also hope I'm not overloading on the details... A friend (L) with a background in Early Childhood Development helped several other friends with toddlers.........

[Wills & Trusts] What is the name of your state? Oregon Are life insurance proceeds part of the estate? Or do they go directly to the beneficiary without going thru the estate?......

[BANKRUPTCY & CONSUMER CREDIT] I am aware that the department of education can intercept tax refunds, and garnish wages, but can they put a freeze bank accounts or put liens on real estate? I am more than willing to pay this damn student loan. But the original $6000 loan is now almost $17,000. It sickens me to be manipulated.........

[COURTS, LAWYERS & LITIGATION] What is the name of your state? Pennsylvania hello, on 3/02 i ordered a rechromed bumper from a company in chicago, il. for my 66 chevy. after 60 days company said he couldnt send bumper and was going to send refund. after many months of no payment, the better business bureau, il. state attorney.........

[Wills & Trusts] What is the name of your state? Minnesota Does the lawyer that the executor is using to probate the will have to let the beneficeriars of the trust and will know what is going on in terms of the process of probate. The lawyer my brother in law had draw up my father in laws will and trust and now.........