Home » LAW »» Traffic Law

CVC 22349(a) (Traffic Law)

Tue, 15 Dec 2009 04:44:00 GMT

My question involves a speeding ticket from the State of: California

My approximate speed indicated on the ticket was 70mph and it was with radar. The posted limit was 55mph, the conditions were clear and dry. Traffic was light since it was at 1am(No cars around except for 1 or 2 that passed while being pulled onto the shoulder). I was cited for CVC 22349(a):

"22349. (a) Except as provided in Section 22356, no person may drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than 65 miles per hour."

I was on the SR-76 a four lane highway divided with a median, however there are occasional street lights. Is it odd I was cited for the 22349(a) rather then the 22350? I believe I was traveling at 65mph according to my speedometer, which is what I told the officer. How would I go about finding the Speed Zone Survey for the road? I also know the previously was a 65mph zone but was changed approximately 5 years ago.

Would it be worth contesting? If so, should I argue that I wasn't exceeding the speed of 65mph of the citation or 55mph of the posted?

Comments (6) | Promote | Bookmark |

  • Leave a Comment Now.
  • Comments
  • Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:39:00 GMT(1)
  • Quoting That Guy


    First, I am not bitter... Only you would know what being bitter is like.

    Did you REALLY just tell me, "I know you are... but what am I?" Great job, Peewee Herman!!
  • Tue, 15 Dec 2009 05:03:00 GMT(2)
  • Unless you can prove that the officer's Radar measurement of 70mph was incorrect or innaccurate, then simply suggesting that you "believe you were traveling at 65mph according to your speedometer" will not be sufficient.

    Also, road conditions are irrelevant when it comes to a 22349 charge. Lastly, I'm not sure how a speed survey (assuming one does exist) will help you in any way. You were charged with exceeding a statutory speed limit and therefore, it is unlikely that the officer will present a survey as part of his case against you.

    Just my 2 cent's worth...
  • Tue, 15 Dec 2009 18:25:00 GMT(3)
  • I don't agree with That Guy. You don't have to PROVE anything. You only need to raise reasonable doubt.

    1. You only have to show that you were not exceeding the statutory 65mph limit... not the 55. So, you were only 5mph over.

    2. The cop likely won't bring a speed survey, so you can say he failed to meet the requirements of 40803(b). Case law is conflicted. You can quote people v. studley.

    3. Be aware that when they send you your courtesy notice, it is likely your fine will be based on 55mph vice 65mph. If that happens, then you can argue that the state relied on the posted limit and therefore the speed trap laws apply.
  • Tue, 15 Dec 2009 18:43:00 GMT(4)
  • Quoting EWYLTJ


    I don't agree with That Guy. You don't have to PROVE anything. You only need to raise reasonable doubt.

    1. You only have to show that you were not exceeding the statutory 65mph limit... not the 55. So, you were only 5mph over.

    And, under the circumstances, the officer will more than likely testify that he clocked the OP at 70 mph, and further present calibration certificates, training certificates... etc... establishing that his speed measurement was sufficiently accurate... Care to elaborate as to how the defendant should attempt to raise reasonable doubt as to the 5 mph?

    Are you suggesting that the defendant's statement that "I believe I was traveling at 65mph according to my speedometer" should be sufficient to do that?
  • Tue, 15 Dec 2009 21:24:00 GMT(5)
  • Quoting That Guy


    And, under the circumstances, the officer will more than likely testify that he clocked the OP at 70 mph, and further present calibration certificates, training certificates... etc... establishing that his speed measurement was sufficiently accurate... Care to elaborate as to how the defendant should attempt to raise reasonable doubt as to the 5 mph?

    Are you suggesting that the defendant's statement that "I believe I was traveling at 65mph according to my speedometer" should be sufficient to do that?

    Don't be bitter just because you forgot that the defendant is innocent until proven guilty and not vice versa.

    I think the OP should request discovery so as to obtain the calibration records. He can likely raise reasonable doubt to a a few mph and at that point, he could ask for a dismissal in the interest of justice rather than render a conviction for 2mph.

    Also, in addition to the four defense suggestions I have provided, I would advise the OP to inspect all documents introduced into court. If any of the documents are not originals or certified true copies, he should object to their admission into evidence (also, object to the cop's testimony). If he can bounce the calibration reports that way, he should be able to raise reasonable doubt about the 5mph.

    Now, that's five suggested defenses I have offered. I think the OP should try them all. What have you offered other than a snarky poke at me?
  • Wed, 16 Dec 2009 11:34:00 GMT(6)
  • Quoting EWYLTJ


    Don't be bitter just because you forgot that the defendant is innocent until proven guilty and not vice versa.

    First, I am not bitter... Only you would know what being bitter is like.

    Second, the only thing that I forgot is that you continue to think you are right ALL the time... So if it makes you happy, you are right...Even when you're wrong, you right! But that's your issue, not mine!

    Third... fine, I slipped and used the word "prove" when instead, and since I have to spell everything out for some people, I will restate what I had initially posted:

    "Unless you can somehow establish that the officer's Radar measurement of 70mph was incorrect or inaccurate, then simply suggesting that you "believe you were traveling at 65mph according to your speedometer" will not be sufficient."

    With that being said, and if someone were to argue that any inaccuracy (+/- 1 to 2 mph) in a calibrated Radar reading could persumably result in a "measured speed minus the error rate", then they must EQUALLY consider that the result might also mean "measured speed PLUS the error rate"... Average both out and you're back at what the officer testified to as being the MEASURED SPEED. So much for "reasonable doubt".

    Ever consider that analogy as being the reason why courts will usually accept a radar reading for what it is, rather than what YOU want it to be?

    dbuch, good luck in court... And please update us on how it all works out!
  • Leave a Comment Now.

Traffic Law Open Questions

CVC 22349(a)

My question involves a speeding ticket from the State of:California. I was cited for speeding on 1/31/09 for doing 85 mph in a 65 mph zone on my sportbike. This was on the 5 South by Washington St. in San Diego. I plan on doing a TBD to fight my case, but need some more personal advice as to how......

CVC 22349 (A) Wrong Code.can This Be My Defense

My question involves a speeding ticket from the State of: California I recently received a speeding ticket that indicates I violated CVC 22349 (A), "Max speed 65". Interestingly I received the ticket while driving 66 mph in a posted 45 zone on a 4 lane (divided by islands) residential......

CVC 22348(B) Ticket

My question involves a speeding ticket from the State of: California I was pulled over a couple days ago on the I-5 in Fresno County. (Apparently... Kern and Fresno Counties are gold mines for these people.) Anyways, it was CHP officer who got me at 106 mph in a 70 zone, I was aware I was......

CVC 21804 A - Yield to Traffic

My question involves a traffic accident in the State of: California While waiting to turn left out of a private shopping center, I encountered a situation where cars were stopped in the 2 lanes behind a KEEP CLEAR section where I was about to turn out of. A vehicle, who had entered the turn lane......

CVC 21801(A), Failure to Yield on Left Turn

My question involves a traffic ticket from the state of:California I arrived at the light, the officer was to my left and I had all green lights. I then proceeded to make a left turn, then immediately the officer turned on his lights, made a u-turn to get behind me and then pulled me over. He......

CVC 21755 - Will I Win In Court?

My question involves a traffic ticket from the state of: CA 21755. The driver of a motor vehicle may overtake and pass another vehicle upon the right only under conditions permitting such movement in safety. In no event shall such movement be made by driving off the paved or main-traveled portion......

CVC 21658(A) - Unsafe Lane Change Ticket

My question involves a traffic ticket from the state of: California I was pulled over driving 70 in a 70mph zone. (The officer wrote 65 on the ticket for some reason) and got pulled over for an unsafe lane change. It was a two lane freeway and I saw some headlights come from far away and pull up......

CVC 21655.8(A) Violation

My question involves a traffic ticket from the state of: California CHP (Beat 92 Area 670 / City=Buena Park) I just received my "golden ticket" from California's finest the writting is a bit faded but.... 21655.8(A)VC - Cross over DBL yellow lines from #1 into HOV (My record is clean at......

CVC 21453a California

My question involves a traffic ticket from the state of: California I was in a downtown district and the car in front of me slowed down and turned at a light. Slowing down for that car I didn't make it all the way through the intersection before the red light hit and got pulled over. The police......

CVC 14604 (a)

I live in California. My wife’s cousin bough a car, and I registered the car under my name to help him. He was involved in a bumper to bumper accident, and I was cited with CVC 14604 (a) The police officer wrote the correct vehicle code on the citation but circled infraction. When I went......

Some questions maybe you're interest in...

Need advice about any better solution than divorce.

[Family Law] What is the name of your state? TX It is 7 years marriage now, and I just discovered my wife had an affair with her old friend month ago while traveling to the hometown. She regrets and still wants to keep our marriage. I was struggling since we have 2 years old boys and we do not want kids.........

Name of form to file for Contempt?

[Family Law] I need to file contempt. In Oregon. Do YOU know the name of the form? I've been patient. Past due monies owed for 50% of uninsured dental bills. NCP was sent all bills, receipts. I paid in full, he's refused to repay me his portion of the dental bills. He sent $20 on $118 bill. Along with a.........

Is a Marine Recruitment Commander Allowed to Report Information About Me

[CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE] Is a marine recruitment commander allowed to report information about me to some kind of government agency or background check company? he called me about joining hte marines in return for a full ride tuition at any 4-year school that is willing to accept me during the preeliminary questionaire i.........

Help: Post Office will not deliver SOME mail?

[Government & Administrative Law] What is the name of your state? Utah Today, I helped my father setup online access to his Well Fargo bank account. He found that he had multiple over withdraw fees starting back in December 2005 until now. He did not know he was even in the hole. He is a retired government employee and he.........

The injury ocurred in Puerto Rico..

[Accidents & Personal Injury Law] What is the name of your state?I currently reside in central Florida but theincident took place in Puerto Rico at a Privete Baotist Preschool when I was about 3 or 4. i dont really remember what happened but part of my finger was severd because of a heavy metal door at the school. I needed.........

Please Help Can they really do this to me?

[Employment & Labor Law] What is the name of your state? I am from Illinois & a Union Worker with SEIU local 1 I had injured myself on the job on Nov 21,2003 it resulted in me having to have surgery on both my left & right shoulders & also surgery on my right knee. In the begining I had some trouble with.........

What laws protect a comedian?

[Consumer Law & Fraud] What is the name of your state?What is the name of your state?What is the name of your state? CALIFORNIA I'm creating an "edgy humor" website and would like to make sure I'm not going to get my pants sued off for doing so. Have you seen sites like http://www.lacunainc.com and.........

legal name change

[Wills & Trusts] What is the name of your state? WA If I change my name legally, will it affect existing legal documents, like car title and home title and insurance etc. Do I have to have the titles changed to reflect the new name or will I somehow still be legally accessible as my former name? If I am listed.........

What Does the Federal AOP Stand For

[Additional Legal Subjects] I am just curious. No, right or wrong answer. What does the Federal "AOP" stand for? What is the AOP? Is 17 the consent for all 50 states in the USA? I am just curious on how it works. That is all.......

Forged Bank Document

[CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE] What is the name of your state? New York An South American citizen visiting on a visitors visa forged a document which was used by them to open a U.S. bank account. I'm trying to find out what the repercussions of the bank and immigrations and naturalization finding out about that.........